Innovative instructional strategies for developing creative learning in language and literature in the third year
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: the development of creative learning in language and literature in the third year of basic education is a fundamental process for the comprehensive education of students, since it favors the expression of ideas, imagination and the meaningful construction of knowledge. Objectives: the present research focused on the objective of designing innovative didactic strategies for the development of creative learning in third-year students. Methodology: the research approach is mixed, theoretical, empirical and statistical-mathematical methods were used. Among the theoretical methods, the historical-logical method was used to identify trends in the evolution of the object of study; systematization, with the purpose of reaching theoretical generalizations; and modeling, aimed at the scientific construction of the proposal. Results: limitations were identified in the originality of oral and written productions, in the generation of creative ideas and in the use of innovative didactic resources in the classroom. Conclusions: based on these results, innovative didactic strategies aimed at the development of creative learning were proposed as a scientific result, which promote active participation, imagination, interpretation of texts and literary production. The proposal was evaluated through the partial introduction in educational practice, which allowed evidence of its didactic effectiveness in strengthening creativity in language and literature. General area of study: Education. Specific area of study: Didactics of Language and Literature. Item type: Original.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bastidas Beltrán, L. B., Castro Alvarado, J. N., Anzules Ballesteros, J. E., & Maliza Cruz, W. I. (2025). Dosage of literary works to encourage comprehensive reading in technical high school. Visionario Digital, 9(2), 101-125. https://doi.org/10.33262/visionariodigital.v9i2.3399
Carrillo Segura, J. E., Holguín Gruezo, C. del R., Parreño Sánchez, J. del C., & Rumbaut Rangel, D. (2025). Gamified activities around language and literature for elementary school students. Ciencia Digital, 9(4), 206-225. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v9i4.3563
De Cássia Moura de Carvalho, T., De Souza Fleith, D., & Da Silva Almeida, L. (2021). Desarrollo del pensamiento creativo en el ámbito educativo. Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 17(1), 164-187. https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2021.17.1.9
Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
Jiménez Díaz, D. M., Alarcón Iza, P. E., Edith Noriega , J., & Sánchez Andrade, V. (2024). Incidence of Educaplay as a gamified strategy in the teaching of metacognition techniques in language and literature for upper elementary school. Ciencia Digital, 8(4), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v8i4.3204
Lara Chichande, S. A. (2020). El pensamiento creativo en el desarrollo de la comunicación oral en los estudiantes de básica superior [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador]. https://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/server/api/core/bitstreams/328ae7c1-ad63-4c4f-b7d8-d4fa06fee5d6/content
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2021). Currículo priorizado con énfasis en competencias comunicacionales, matemáticas, digitales y socioemocionales - Educación general básica subnivel medio. https://recursos.educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Curri%CC%81culo-con-e%CC%81nfasis-en-CC-CM-CD-CS_-media.pdf
Oliveira, E., Almeida, L., Ferrándiz, C., Ferrando, M., Sainz, M., & Prieto, M. D. (2009). Tests de pensamiento creativo de Torrance (TTCT): elementos para la validez de constructo en adolescentes portugueses. Psicothema, 4(21), 562-567. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3671.pdf
Oña Loja, D. V., Jaya Ruiz, G. M., Tapia Coloma, D. A., & Boredo Arizaga, L. del C. (2025). Canva como estrategia innovadora para la enseñanza de lengua y literatura en tercer grado de B.G.U. Alfa Publicaciones, 7(4), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.33262/ap.v7i4.656
Orellana Guevara, C. (2016). La estrategia didáctica y su uso dentro del proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje en el contexto de las bibliotecas escolares. E-Ciencias de la Información, 17(1), 134-154. https://doi.org/10.15517/eci.v7i1.27241
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
Rios Illapa, M. L., Chacha Rios, L. H., Piñera Concepción, Y. de la C., & Martínez Isaac, R. (2025). Didactic tasks for reading and writing in baccalaureate students. Ciencia Digital, 9(4), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v9i4.3530
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Segura Urrutia, D., Blanco Alfonso, B. L., & González Hernández, W. (2024). Aprendizaje creativo de la ingeniería del software en la formación del profesional informático en la Universidad de Matanzas. Acta Universitaria, 34, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2024.3949
Tapia López, S. L. (2024). La importancia del aprendizaje basado en la creatividad en los futuros profesionistas para enfrentar los retos del entorno actual. Revista Panamericana de Pedagogía, 38, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.21555/rpp.vi38.3110
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://home.fau.edu/musgrove/web/vygotsky1978.pdf
Wang, A., & Burdina, G. (2024). Developing students’ creative thinking using innovative education technologies. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3490–3500. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2184390
Yu, X., Wang, T.-Y., & Yuizono, T. (2023). Creativity development through questioning activity in second language education. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1178655