Design of a didactic sequence to address frequent errors in 2×2 linear equation systems at U.E. Gonzalo Zaldumbide
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: solving 2×2 systems of linear equations is an essential topic in high school; however, students frequently make errors in both conceptual understanding and algebraic procedures. This teaching sequence aims to address these difficulties through active activities, error analysis, and the use of digital resources, with the goal of fostering logical reasoning, participation, and learning in the classroom. Objective: to design a teaching sequence based on error analysis and the use of digital tools to address the most frequent difficulties in solving 2×2 systems of linear equations in the first year of high school at the Gonzalo Zaldumbide Educational Unit. Methodology: the study employed a quantitative, applied approach with a descriptive scope and a cross-sectional, non-experimental design, following research and development methodology. The purposive, non-probability sample consisted of 24 mathematics students and teachers. The information was obtained through a diagnostic pedagogical test, a teacher perception questionnaire with a Likert scale, and a validation form based on expert criteria. The data were processed using descriptive statistics, percentages, means, standard deviation, Cronbach's alpha, and the Content Validity Index (CVI). Results: the diagnosis revealed major difficulties in the procedural dimension, followed by the verification-representational one. A 12-session sequence was designed, structured into four modules (substitution, elimination, reduction, and graphical method with GeoGebra). Specialists validated its relevance and applicability with a CVI of 0.80. Conclusion: the designed sequence constitutes a coherent and feasible methodological alternative to address conceptual, procedural, and representational errors in linear systems. General area of study: Education. Specific area of study: Education. Type of study: Original.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. https://books.google.com/books?id=JPkXAQAAMAAJ
Brousseau, G. (2007). Iniciación al estudio de la teoría de las situaciones didácticas. Libros del Zorzal. https://archive.org/details/brousseau-g.-iniciacion-al-estudio-de-las-situaciones-didacticas/page/n3/mode/2up
Díaz-Barriga, Á. (2013). Learning sequence. A problem of competences approach or rethinking didactics? Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 17(3), 11–33. https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/19668
García Arroyo, M. M., & Atilano Belmonte, A. L. (2024). Los errores matemáticos identificados en el examen diagnóstico de álgebra a estudiantes de primer semestre del Centro de Estudios Científicos y Tecnológicos No. 16 “Hidalgo”. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 5(3), 1469–1481. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i3.2131
González-Lomelí, D., Maytorena-Noriega, M. de los Á., González-Franco, V., López-Sauceda, M. del R., & Fuentes-Vega, M. de los Á. (2021). Zona de desarrollo próximo y desempeño de universitarios en una prueba de ejecución. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 1(58), 93–103. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4596/459669141008/html/
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2016). Currículo de los niveles de educación obligatoria. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/03/Curriculo1.pdf
Movshovitz-Hadar, N., Zaslavsky, O., & Inbar, S. (1987). An empirical classification model for errors in high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/749532
Muñiz-Rodríguez, L., Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., & Abella Rodríguez, A. (2022). Errores del alumnado de Educación Secundaria al manejar y resolver sistemas de dos ecuaciones lineales con dos incógnitas. Epsilon: Revista de la Sociedad Andaluza de Educación Matemática "Thales", (111), 7-28.
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8644952
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM. https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press https://books.google.com.ec/books/about/Science_of_Education_and_the_Psychology.html?id=ZwedAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press. https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=X3xsgXjTGgoC&printsec=frontcover&hl=es&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization (6th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. https://archive.org/details/essentialsofnurs00deni/page/n3/mode/2up
Radatz, A. (1979). Error Analysis in Mathematics Education, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10(3), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/748804
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://w.pauldowling.me/rtf/2021.1/readings/LSVygotsky_1978_MindinSocietyDevelopmentofHigherPsycholo.pdf