Comparative study of multifocal and monovision contact lenses in presbyopic patients at the Valle de los Chillos optometric center
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Multifocal and monovision contact lenses are designed to provide unique features to the wearer to focus images at different distances without the need to wear frame lenses. Objectives: The effectiveness of the two adaptation techniques was evaluated: conventional monovision and multifocal contact lenses in presbyopic patients. Methodology: This is an analytical and descriptive study, conducted over a period of 6 months, and 9 patients aged 47 to 57 years who attended the optometric consultation were evaluated. Results: In both techniques, adaptation was performed with monthly contact lenses made of comfilcon A material, initially applying the Schirmer I test, the lacrimal meniscus, the BUT (Break-Up Time) test; in addition, the contrast test and the pre- and post-adaptation decimal visual acuity were used to obtain accurate results of both techniques. Statistical analysis was conducted with Student and Wilcoxon t-tests with a 95% confidence interval. Conclusions: A variation was observed in relation to the two techniques. It was determined in a statistically significant way that multifocal contact lenses in near visual acuity are more effective than monovision (Student's paired test P=0.430) (Wilcoxon's paired test P=0.686). In addition, it was found that monovision is more effective in distance visual acuity than multifocal monovision in a statistically significant way (Paired Student t-test P=0.341) (Wilcoxon paired test P=0.317). General area of study: Health. Specific area of study: Optometry. Item type: Original.
Downloads
Article Details
References
2. Palazzo JA. Revisión y análisis del tratamiento farmacológico de la presbicia en emetropía. Oftalmología Clínica y Experimental [Internet]. 2019 [citado 15 de septiembre 2025]; 12(1): 1-6. Disponible en: https://oftalmologos.org.ar/oce_anteriores/files/original/8adcd011a14392e5807e1e8c0fc61c7e.pdf
3. Bakaraju RC, Tilia D, Sha J, Diec J, Chung J, Kho D, et al. Lentes de contacto de profundidad de foco extendido vs. dos lentes multifocales comerciales: Parte 2. Rendimiento visual tras una semana de uso. Journal of Optometry [Internet]. 2018 [citado 15 de septiembre 2025]; 11(1): 21–32. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2017.04.001
4. Chang DH, Waring GO, Hom M, Barnett M. Presbyopia treatments by mechanism of action: a new classification system based on a review of the literature. Clinical Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2021 [cited 15 September 2025];15: 3733-3745. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34522079/
5. Alvarez TL, Kim EH, Granger-Donetti B. Adaptation to progressive additive lenses: potential factors to consider. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2017 [cited 15 September 2025]; 7(1):2529. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02851-5.
6. Zeri F, Naroo SA, Zoccolotti P, De Luca M. Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes. Scientific Report [Internet]. 2018 [cited 15 September 2025]; 8:15574. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33934-6
7. Hipsley AM, Hall B, Rocha KM. Scleral surgery for the treatment of presbyopia: where are we today? Eye and Vision [Internet]. 2018 [cited 15 September 2025]; 5:4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0098-x
8. Heranz R, Vecilla G. Manual de Optometría. Editorial Medica Panamericana [Internet]. 2012 [citado 15 de septiembre 2025]. Disponible en: https://www.medicapanamericana.com/es-ES/libros/manual-de-optometria-2a-edicion?srsltid=AfmBOoruVAcJAgs_hmw0q1cousJN-d3OM0GLbZj_I0vE4KM0KkwKoJq4
9. Sharma G, Chiva-Razavi S, Viriato D, Naujoks C, Patalano F, Bentley S, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review. BMJ Open Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2020 [cited 15 September 2025]; 5: e000453. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
10. Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS] [Internet]. Ceguera y Discapacidad Visual. 2018 [citado 15 de septiembre 2025]. Disponible en:
https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment
11. Shemesh Health Solutions [Internet]. Chart2020 - instruction for use (version 10). 2020 [cited 15 September 2025]. Available from: https://www.chart2020.com/Chart2020/PDF/InitialSetupInstructions.pdf
12. García Angulo M. Rendimiento visual del paciente présbita con lentes de contacto multifocales. Optometría Clínica y Ciencias de la Visión [Internet]. 2024 [citado 15 de septiembre 2025]; 3(1):20-29. Disponible en: https://revistaoccv.es/index.php/occv/article/view/16
13. Morgan PB, Efron N, Woods CA, Jones D, Jones L, Nichols JJ. International trends in prescribing multifocal and monovision soft contact lenses to correct presbyopia (2000–2023): an update. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye [Internet]. 2025 [cited 15 September 2025]; 48(2):102348. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102348
14. Kim DY, Ahn H, Lee S, Jun I, Seo KY, Kim SY, et al. Efficacy of a new refractive multifocal contact lens for presbyopia. Scientific Report [Internet]. 2024 [cited 15 September 2025]; 14:8878. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55918-5
15. Mena-Guevara KJ, De Fez D, Pinero DP. Impact on distance and near contrast sensitivity of multifocal contact lenses: a systematic review. Eye Contact Lens [Internet]. 2025 [cited 15 September 2025]; 51(3): e117–e122. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001149